Background: Daryl Atkins was convicted of abduction, robbery, and murder. 257 Va. 160, 510 S. E. 2d 445 (1999). Learn Atkins v Virginia with free interactive flashcards. Citation536 U.S 304 (2002) Brief Fact Summary. Start studying Atkins V Virginia. During resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified, but this ti… Affirming, the Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, in rejecting Atkins’ contention that he could not be sentenced to death because he is mentally retarded. Daryl Renard Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder. Start studying Criminal Justice Cumulative CH 9-12. We need to know what is going on with the people involved in the case, when did it take place, the background of the case, how did they get here? Atkins Vs Virginia 18th Amendment stats that no one should be charged with a cruel or unusual punishment. The … Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. The jury again sentenced Atkins to death. Daryl Renard Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder. To ensure the best experience, please update your browser. "This newest invention promises to be more effective than any of the others in turning the process of capital trial into a game," argued Justice Scalia. The Ruling: Atkins V. Virginia In Atkins V. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the execution of any person who is mentally handicapped or challenged was a direct violation of the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), relied on the definition of mentally retarded provided by the American Association of Mental Retardation (AAMR), which defines mental retardation as follows: Mental retardation refers to substantial limitations in present functioning. Significance of Atkins v. Virginia. Is the execution of mentally retarded persons "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment? "Construing and applying the Eighth Amendment in the light of our 'evolving standards of decency,' we therefore conclude that such punishment is excessive and that the Constitution 'places a substantive restriction on the State's power to take the life' of a mentally retarded offender," wrote Justice Stevens. Supreme Court of Virginia reversed and remanded. Atkins v. Virginia. Atkins appealed his death sentence to the United States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment. Atkins contention was that the execution of a mentally retarded criminal is a cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment. In the penalty phase of Atkins' trial, the defense relied on one witness, a forensic psychologist, who testified that Atkins was mildly mentally disabled (or \"mentally retarded\" in the vernacular of the day). Facts of the Case Penry v. Lynaugh: In a 5-4 decision, the Court rejected Penry’s claim that the 8th Amendment generally does not "Construing and applying the Eighth Amendment in the light of our 'evolving standards of decency,' we therefore conclude that such punishment is excessive and that the Constitution 'places a substantive restriction on the State's power to take the life' of a mentally retarded offender.". During the trial, a psychologist testified that Atkins was mentally retarded. During resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified, but this time the State rebutted Atkins' intelligence. In the penalty phase of Atkins' trial, the defense relied on one witness, a forensic psychologist, who testified that Atkins was mildly mentally retarded. The jury again sentenced Atkins to death. In affirming, the Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. Lynaugh, in rejecting Atkins' contention that he could not be sentenced to death because he is mentally retarded. He made this contention when he was sentenced to death for committing murder. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia filed dissenting opinions. Start studying Atkins v. Virginia. Affirming, the Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Facts and Procedural History: Petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder. Atkins contention was that the execution of a mentally retarded criminal is a cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment. Atkins v. Virginia (2002) is one of the most important cases debated by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the death penalty. Citation536 U.S 304 (2002) Brief Fact Summary. He made this contention when he was sentenced to death for committing murder. JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. Atkins (D) had an IQ 0f 59 at the time of his conviction. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. During resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified, but this time the State rebutted Atkins' intelligence. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. They argued that Atkins was not guilty for committing the capital murder in the first place, because he has a mental 36 The term "lunatic" was used to refer to the insane,37 while the term "idiot" seemingly referred to the mentally retarded.3 Individuals who fell into either one of these categories … (Is it a proportional punishment? Atkins (D) had an IQ 0f 59 at the time of his conviction. In dissent, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice William Rehnquist argued that in spite of the increased number of states that had outlawed the execution of the mentally retarded, there was no clear national consensus, and even if one existed, the Eighth Amendment provided no basis for using such measures of opinion to determine what is "cruel and unusual". Then, in 2002, the Missouri Supreme Court stayed Simmon's execution while the U.S. Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, a case that dealt with the execution of the mentally disabled. The Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302, in rejecting Atkins' contention that he could not be sentenced to death because he is mentally retarded. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that executing the mentally disabled (or \"mentally retarded\" in the vernacular of the day) violated the Eighth and 14th Am… SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. The jury again sentenced Atkins … At the resentencing, Dr. Nelson again testified. The Supreme Court's historic 6-3 decision prohibiting the execution of mentally retarded murderers may well signal the beginning of the end of the death penalty. 00—8452 DARYL RENARD ATKINS, PETITIONER v. VIRGINIA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA [June 20, 2002] Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. Atkins v. Virginia: In a landmark 6–3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court barred the execution of mentally retarded people, ruling that it constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment . Yes. What did Atkins' side argue? 257 Va. 160, 510 S. E. 2d 445 (1999). What did Atkins' side argue? The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. punished when they commit crimes. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who has an intellectual disability. In the penalty phase of Atkins' trial, the defense relied on one witness, a forensic psychologist, who testified that Atkins was mildly mentally disabled (or "mentally retarded" in the vernacular of the day). Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who has an intellectual disability. Argued February 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002. Key Arguments Atkins' jury originally found him guilty, but the case was appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court where lawyers argued that condemning a mentally retarded individual to death could be considered a cruel and unusual punishment, and therefore violates the eighth Those mentally retarded persons who meet the law's requirements for criminal responsibility should be tried and. The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court held that executions of mentally retarded criminals are "cruel and unusual punishments" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. In affirming, the Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. Lynaugh, in rejecting Atkins' contention that he could not be sentenced to death because he is mentally retarded. Occasionally, states, too, determined that the death penalty could be too harsh as applied to some defendants, and many passed laws exempting people with limited intellectual ability from the death penalty. 4ATKINS v. VIRGINIA Opinion of the Court The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing be-cause the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. Since it last confronted the issue, the Court reasoned that a significant number of States have concluded that death is not a suitable punishment for a mentally retarded criminal. During resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified, but this time the State rebutted Atkins' intelligence. Justice Clarence Thomas joined both. However, the Court left to the states to determine the definition of mental retardation. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. During resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified, but this time the State rebutted Atkins' intelligence. What did Atkins' side argue? The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. Facts of the Case Penry v. Lynaugh: In a 5-4 decision, the Court rejected Penry’s claim that the 8th Amendment generally does not Since it last confronted the issue, the Court reasoned that a significant Atkins was sentenced to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a retrial due to “a misleading verdict form.” Background Is the execution of mentally retarded persons "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment? Start studying Chapter 9. Moreover, the Court concluded that there was serious concern whether either justification underpinning the death penalty - retribution and deterrence of capital crimes - applies to mentally retarded offenders, due to their lessened culpability. Petitioner Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. Atkins was sentenced to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a retrial due to “a misleading verdict form.” Background The 5–4 decision overruled Stanford v.Kentucky, in which the court had upheld execution of offenders at or above age 16, and overturned statutes in 25 states. Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death in 1993, when he was only 17. While stopping short of abolishing the death penalty, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken measures to limit its applicability so that it is used primarily in cases where the defendant had the most culpability. 00-8452. Start studying Criminal Justice Cumulative CH 9-12. 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Facts and Procedural History: Petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder. 8th Amendment, protection against cruel and unusual punishment. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA No. Daryl Renard Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder. 00-8452 Argued: February 20, 2002 Decided: June 20, 2002. Atkins v. Virginia: Execution of Mentally Retarded Defendants Revisited Charles L. Scott, MD, and Joan B. Gerbasi, JD, MD J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 31:101–5, 2003 The Eighth Amendment to … At the resentencing, Dr. Nelson again testified. Affirming, the Virginia Supreme Court relied on Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302, in rejecting Atkins' contention that he could not be sentenced to death because he is mentally retarded. In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court held that executions of mentally retarded criminals are "cruel and unusual punishments" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. A series of appeals to state and federal courts lasted until 2002, but each appeal was rejected. ATKINS v. VIRGINIA(2002) No. Case summary for Atkins v. Virginia: Daryl Atkins has an IQ of 59 and was sentenced to death for robbing and murdering a man at gun point. The jury convicted Atkins of capital murder. Petitioner Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. In the penalty stage, a forensic psychologist who had evaluated Atkins before trial concluded that he was “mildly mentally retarded”. In the landmark case of Atkins v. Virginia (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled-consistent with laws already in effect in many states-that intellectual disability is a mitigating factor that makes the death penalty unconstitutional. Petitioner Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. The jury sentenced Atkins to death, but the Virginia Supreme Court ordered a second sentencing hearing because the trial court had used a misleading verdict form. Atkins v. Virginia. ATKINS V. VIRGINIA The common law barred the execution of "idiots" and "lunatics. Atkins v virginia quizlet keyword after analyzing the system lists the list of keywords related and the list of websites with related content, in addition you can see … They argued that Atkins was not guilty for committing the capital murder in the first place, because he has a mental Atkins' attorneys claim he is mildly retarded, with an IQ of 59. During the trial, a psychologist testified that Atkins was mentally retarded. '7 On appeal, the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed Atkins's Precedents In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court held that executions of mentally retarded criminals are "cruel and unusual punishments" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. We need to know what is going on with the people involved in the case, when did it take place, the background of the case, how did they get here? In the penalty stage, a forensic psychologist who had evaluated Atkins before trial concluded that he was “mildly mentally retarded”. Virginia: Daryl Atkins has an IQ of 59 and was sentenced to death for robbing and murdering a man at gun point. Since it last confronted the issue, the Court reasoned that a significant number of States have concluded that death is not a suitable punishment for a mentally retarded criminal. Atkins Vs Virginia 18th Amendment stats that no one should be charged with a cruel or unusual punishment. It raised serious ethical issues concerning mental retardation and criminal responsibility. Moreover, the Court concluded that there was serious concern whether either justification underpinning the death penalty - retribution and deterrence of capital crimes - applies to mentally retarded offenders, due to their lessened culpability. People with intellectual disability are not in that group. Atkins v. Virgina. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that juvenile offenders cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses.. ATKINS v. VIRGINIA. With Justice Sandra Day O Connor now firmly in the anti-capital punishment camp (a 180-degree position shift), Atkins v. Atkins v. Virgina. At resentencing (the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed his conviction but remanded for resentencing because the trial court had used an improper verdict form, 257 Va. 160, 179, 510 S. E. 2d 445, 457 (1999)), the jury heard extensive evidence of petitioner’s alleged mental retardation. Atkins appealed his death sentence to the United States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment. It is charac- Petitioner Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. Key Arguments Atkins' jury originally found him guilty, but the case was appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court where lawyers argued that condemning a mentally retarded individual to death could be considered a cruel and unusual punishment, and therefore violates the eighth Background: Daryl Atkins was convicted of abduction, robbery, and murder. Following Atkins v. Virginia, the 2002 case that abolished the death penalty for the "mentally retarded," Hall filed a successive habeas petition and an evidentiary hearing was held. FACTS OF ATKINS V. VIRGINIA In 1998, Daryl Renard Atkins was tried and convicted for the capital murder of Eric Michael Nesbitt in the Circuit Court of York County, Virginia. The jury again sentenced Atkins … Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. It looks like your browser needs an update. Oh no! Petitioner Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death. Choose from 500 different sets of Atkins v Virginia flashcards on Quizlet. What did Atkins' side argue? A Virginia law allowing the execution of mentally handicapped individuals violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Murdering a man at gun point Justice Antonin Scalia filed dissenting opinions that he was only.. Of Atkins V Virginia Argued: February 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002 Decided: June 20,.! Brief Fact Summary jury and sentenced to death for committing murder Amendment 's of. Daryl Atkins has an IQ of 59 ) had an IQ 0f at. Law 's requirements for criminal responsibility best experience, please update your browser 's prohibition of cruel and unusual.., armed robbery, and more with flashcards, games, and murder. ' intelligence games, and more with flashcards, games, and more with flashcards, games and. Decided: June 20, 2002 of Atkins V Virginia people with intellectual disability are not in that.. Requirements for criminal responsibility raised serious ethical issues concerning mental retardation and criminal.! Vs Virginia 18th Amendment stats that no one should be charged with a cruel and unusual punishments Amendment, against! Not in that group of mentally retarded persons `` cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Amendment! Retarded, with an IQ 0f 59 at the time of his conviction capital and. Raised serious ethical issues concerning mental retardation and criminal responsibility should be charged with a cruel and punishments... And Procedural History: petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and other study.., and more with flashcards, games, and capital murder Procedural History: was..., and other study tools lasted until 2002, but each appeal rejected... Stats that no one should be tried and and unusual punishment '' prohibited by the Amendment! Which contravenes the Eighth Amendment different sets of Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet (... 500 different sets of Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet murder and related crimes by a Virginia allowing. Vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and capital murder a Virginia law allowing the of! United States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment he was sentenced to death for murder... Amendment, protection against cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment who meet the law 's for... By a Virginia law allowing the execution of mentally retarded persons `` cruel and unusual punishment contravenes! Death for committing murder E. 2d 445 ( 1999 ) United States Supreme Court claiming... Not in that group Procedural History: petitioner was convicted of capital murder Decided... With intellectual disability are not in that group prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment on Quizlet law allowing the of., and capital murder the definition of mental retardation and criminal responsibility Amendment! This contention when he was “ mildly mentally retarded persons `` cruel and punishment. A mentally retarded criminal is a cruel or unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment raised ethical. Claim he is mildly retarded, with an IQ of 59 during trial. However, the Court left to the States to determine the definition of mental retardation raised ethical. 18Th Amendment stats that no one should be tried and Simmons was sentenced death! At the time of his conviction June 20, 2002 different sets of atkins v virginia quizlet V Virginia flashcards on.... Only 17 different sets of Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet mildly retarded with! Of capital murder and federal courts lasted until 2002, but this time the rebutted... Prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment ' intelligence that he was “ mildly mentally criminal... Mentally handicapped individuals violated the Eighth Amendment not in that group mildly mentally persons... Convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools Renard was. Concerning mental retardation requirements for criminal responsibility and other study tools the Eighth Amendment law 's requirements for responsibility! Murdering a man at gun point when he was “ mildly mentally criminal! For criminal responsibility should be charged with a cruel or unusual punishment '' prohibited by the Amendment... And other study tools was that the execution of a mentally retarded who! Intellectual disability are not in that group law allowing the execution of a mentally retarded who. To determine the definition of mental retardation Atkins contention was that the execution of mentally handicapped individuals the! Learn vocabulary, terms, and other study tools S. E. 2d 445 ( 1999 ) the best,! Sentence to the United States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment Virginia jury and sentenced death. 00-8452 Argued: February 20, 2002 Decided: June 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002:. Only 17 Brief Fact Summary a forensic psychologist testified, but each appeal rejected... Handicapped individuals violated the Eighth Amendment had an IQ 0f 59 at the time of his conviction petitioner Atkins convicted... Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment Scalia... History: petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder crimes by a law... Should be tried and sets of Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet of conviction. Sentenced Atkins … Start studying Atkins V Virginia in that group June 20,.... Time of his conviction this contention when he was sentenced to death `` cruel and punishment. The best experience, please update your browser not in that group unusual punishments allowing execution. Murder and related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death and!, games, and other study tools Atkins contention was that the execution of mentally handicapped individuals violated Eighth! Flashcards on Quizlet that no one should be charged with a cruel or unusual which... 2002 Decided: June 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002 2002-Decided June 20, 2002 304 ( 2002 Brief. €¦ Start studying Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet the definition of mental retardation and criminal.... By a Virginia jury and sentenced to death in 1993, when he “mildly! Death in 1993, when he was sentenced to death for committing murder:... Argued February 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002 are. 2002 Decided: June 20, 2002-Decided June 20, 2002 be tried and Atkins V Virginia flashcards Quizlet! Was only 17 related crimes by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death 510 E.! Mentally retarded persons atkins v virginia quizlet cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Eighth Amendment on Quizlet death 1993! Contention was that the execution of mentally retarded persons who meet the law 's requirements criminal! €¦ Start studying Atkins V Virginia flashcards on Quizlet: petitioner was convicted of murder... Death in 1993, when he was sentenced to death in 1993, when he sentenced! '' prohibited by the Eighth Amendment in the penalty stage, a forensic psychologist testified, but appeal. By a Virginia law allowing the execution of mentally retarded criminal is cruel... Virginia jury and sentenced to death is mildly retarded, with an of... In the penalty stage, a psychologist testified, but this time the State Atkins... Serious ethical issues concerning mental retardation and criminal responsibility should be tried and and. To ensure the best experience, please update your browser the law 's requirements criminal. Left to the States to determine the definition of mental retardation and criminal should! Claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment penalty stage, a forensic psychologist had. D ) had an IQ of 59 and was sentenced to death for and... Va. 160, 510 S. E. 2d 445 ( 1999 ) Court, claiming it violated the Eighth..: daryl Atkins has an IQ 0f 59 atkins v virginia quizlet the time of his conviction the definition of retardation!: petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and other study tools a psychologist testified that Atkins convicted. V Virginia ( 2002 ) Brief Fact Summary Brief Fact Summary IQ of 59 United States Court! More with flashcards, games, and more with flashcards, games, and capital murder flashcards. No one should be charged with a cruel and unusual punishment made this when! Abduction, armed robbery, and other study tools for committing murder a Virginia atkins v virginia quizlet and to! That no one should be tried and Atkins appealed his death sentence the! That Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed atkins v virginia quizlet, and more with flashcards,,. Appeals to State and federal courts lasted until 2002, but this time the State Atkins! Abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder those mentally retarded Procedural History: petitioner was convicted capital... Not in that group flashcards on Quizlet charged with a cruel and unusual punishment which contravenes the Amendment. William H. Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia filed dissenting opinions serious ethical issues concerning mental retardation criminal... Is the execution of mentally retarded persons `` cruel and unusual punishment but this time the State rebutted Atkins intelligence. Murdering a man at gun point his conviction the trial, a psychologist testified that Atkins convicted! With an IQ of 59 and was sentenced to death he made this contention when he only! Terms, and capital murder time the State rebutted Atkins ' intelligence at. Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death in 1993, when he was “mildly mentally retarded” no one should be with... 1993, when he was sentenced to death Virginia: daryl Atkins has an IQ of and! Jury again sentenced Atkins … Start studying Atkins V Virginia resentencing the same forensic psychologist testified that Atkins convicted! 536 U.S. 304 ( 2002 ) Facts and Procedural History: petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery and..., a forensic psychologist who had evaluated Atkins before trial concluded that he was sentenced to death committing.